aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2023-02-22 09:52:32 -0800
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2023-02-22 09:52:32 -0800
commitf3dd0c53370e70c0f9b7e931bbec12916f3bb8cc (patch)
tree6bf82a6af666fce45243f3ad0a9c70463fa4a910
parent5b7c4cabbb65f5c469464da6c5f614cbd7f730f2 (diff)
downloadlinux-f3dd0c53370e70c0f9b7e931bbec12916f3bb8cc.tar.gz
bpf: add missing header file include
Commit 74e19ef0ff80 ("uaccess: Add speculation barrier to copy_from_user()") built fine on x86-64 and arm64, and that's the extent of my local build testing. It turns out those got the <linux/nospec.h> include incidentally through other header files (<linux/kvm_host.h> in particular), but that was not true of other architectures, resulting in build errors kernel/bpf/core.c: In function ‘___bpf_prog_run’: kernel/bpf/core.c:1913:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘barrier_nospec’ so just make sure to explicitly include the proper <linux/nospec.h> header file to make everybody see it. Fixes: 74e19ef0ff80 ("uaccess: Add speculation barrier to copy_from_user()") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reported-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reported-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Tested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/core.c1
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 933869983e2a0..b297e9f60ca10 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
#include <linux/log2.h>
#include <linux/bpf_verifier.h>
#include <linux/nodemask.h>
+#include <linux/nospec.h>
#include <linux/bpf_mem_alloc.h>
#include <linux/memcontrol.h>