aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2023-10-06 11:05:45 +0100
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2023-10-06 11:05:45 +0100
commitddb23e345724245c46301c3dbc5b86bea180d37b (patch)
treeb9621e166f85d62776770ca1c0cc9017419ee843
parent2a92fccdaca837f65990139207981014970f996c (diff)
parente447056147effae1f77854986b5782bb22d77f62 (diff)
downloadnf-next-ddb23e345724245c46301c3dbc5b86bea180d37b.tar.gz
Merge branch 'sfc-conntrack-offloads'
Edward Cree says: ==================== sfc: conntrack offload for tunnels This series adds support for offloading TC flower rules which require both connection tracking and tunnel decapsulation. Depending on the match keys required, the left-hand-side rule may go in either the Outer Rule table or the Action Rule table. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/mae.c59
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.c329
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.h6
3 files changed, 388 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/mae.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/mae.c
index c3e2b4a21d1055..021980a958b772 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/mae.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/mae.c
@@ -1705,8 +1705,10 @@ static int efx_mae_insert_lhs_outer_rule(struct efx_nic *efx,
/* action */
act = &rule->lhs_act;
- MCDI_SET_DWORD(inbuf, MAE_OUTER_RULE_INSERT_IN_ENCAP_TYPE,
- MAE_MCDI_ENCAP_TYPE_NONE);
+ rc = efx_mae_encap_type_to_mae_type(act->tun_type);
+ if (rc < 0)
+ return rc;
+ MCDI_SET_DWORD(inbuf, MAE_OUTER_RULE_INSERT_IN_ENCAP_TYPE, rc);
/* We always inhibit CT lookup on TCP_INTERESTING_FLAGS, since the
* SW path needs to process the packet to update the conntrack tables
* on connection establishment (SYN) or termination (FIN, RST).
@@ -1734,9 +1736,60 @@ static int efx_mae_insert_lhs_outer_rule(struct efx_nic *efx,
return 0;
}
+static int efx_mae_populate_match_criteria(MCDI_DECLARE_STRUCT_PTR(match_crit),
+ const struct efx_tc_match *match);
+
+static int efx_mae_insert_lhs_action_rule(struct efx_nic *efx,
+ struct efx_tc_lhs_rule *rule,
+ u32 prio)
+{
+ MCDI_DECLARE_BUF(inbuf, MC_CMD_MAE_ACTION_RULE_INSERT_IN_LEN(MAE_FIELD_MASK_VALUE_PAIRS_V2_LEN));
+ MCDI_DECLARE_BUF(outbuf, MC_CMD_MAE_ACTION_RULE_INSERT_OUT_LEN);
+ struct efx_tc_lhs_action *act = &rule->lhs_act;
+ MCDI_DECLARE_STRUCT_PTR(match_crit);
+ MCDI_DECLARE_STRUCT_PTR(response);
+ size_t outlen;
+ int rc;
+
+ match_crit = _MCDI_DWORD(inbuf, MAE_ACTION_RULE_INSERT_IN_MATCH_CRITERIA);
+ response = _MCDI_DWORD(inbuf, MAE_ACTION_RULE_INSERT_IN_RESPONSE);
+ MCDI_STRUCT_SET_DWORD(response, MAE_ACTION_RULE_RESPONSE_ASL_ID,
+ MC_CMD_MAE_ACTION_SET_LIST_ALLOC_OUT_ACTION_SET_LIST_ID_NULL);
+ MCDI_STRUCT_SET_DWORD(response, MAE_ACTION_RULE_RESPONSE_AS_ID,
+ MC_CMD_MAE_ACTION_SET_ALLOC_OUT_ACTION_SET_ID_NULL);
+ EFX_POPULATE_DWORD_5(*_MCDI_STRUCT_DWORD(response, MAE_ACTION_RULE_RESPONSE_LOOKUP_CONTROL),
+ MAE_ACTION_RULE_RESPONSE_DO_CT, !!act->zone,
+ MAE_ACTION_RULE_RESPONSE_DO_RECIRC,
+ act->rid && !act->zone,
+ MAE_ACTION_RULE_RESPONSE_CT_VNI_MODE,
+ MAE_CT_VNI_MODE_ZERO,
+ MAE_ACTION_RULE_RESPONSE_RECIRC_ID,
+ act->rid ? act->rid->fw_id : 0,
+ MAE_ACTION_RULE_RESPONSE_CT_DOMAIN,
+ act->zone ? act->zone->zone : 0);
+ MCDI_STRUCT_SET_DWORD(response, MAE_ACTION_RULE_RESPONSE_COUNTER_ID,
+ act->count ? act->count->cnt->fw_id :
+ MC_CMD_MAE_COUNTER_ALLOC_OUT_COUNTER_ID_NULL);
+ MCDI_SET_DWORD(inbuf, MAE_ACTION_RULE_INSERT_IN_PRIO, prio);
+ rc = efx_mae_populate_match_criteria(match_crit, &rule->match);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ rc = efx_mcdi_rpc(efx, MC_CMD_MAE_ACTION_RULE_INSERT, inbuf, sizeof(inbuf),
+ outbuf, sizeof(outbuf), &outlen);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+ if (outlen < sizeof(outbuf))
+ return -EIO;
+ rule->fw_id = MCDI_DWORD(outbuf, MAE_ACTION_RULE_INSERT_OUT_AR_ID);
+ return 0;
+}
+
int efx_mae_insert_lhs_rule(struct efx_nic *efx, struct efx_tc_lhs_rule *rule,
u32 prio)
{
+ if (rule->is_ar)
+ return efx_mae_insert_lhs_action_rule(efx, rule, prio);
return efx_mae_insert_lhs_outer_rule(efx, rule, prio);
}
@@ -1770,6 +1823,8 @@ static int efx_mae_remove_lhs_outer_rule(struct efx_nic *efx,
int efx_mae_remove_lhs_rule(struct efx_nic *efx, struct efx_tc_lhs_rule *rule)
{
+ if (rule->is_ar)
+ return efx_mae_delete_rule(efx, rule->fw_id);
return efx_mae_remove_lhs_outer_rule(efx, rule);
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.c
index 834f000ba1c49e..3d76b75986317d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.c
@@ -642,6 +642,15 @@ static int efx_tc_flower_record_encap_match(struct efx_nic *efx,
return -EEXIST;
}
break;
+ case EFX_TC_EM_PSEUDO_OR:
+ /* old EM corresponds to an OR that has to be unique
+ * (it must not overlap with any other OR, whether
+ * direct-EM or pseudo).
+ */
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
+ "%s encap match conflicts with existing pseudo(OR) entry",
+ em_type ? "Pseudo" : "Direct");
+ return -EEXIST;
default: /* Unrecognised pseudo-type. Just say no */
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
"%s encap match conflicts with existing pseudo(%d) entry",
@@ -872,6 +881,93 @@ static bool efx_tc_rule_is_lhs_rule(struct flow_rule *fr,
return false;
}
+/* A foreign LHS rule has matches on enc_ keys at the TC layer (including an
+ * implied match on enc_ip_proto UDP). Translate these into non-enc_ keys,
+ * so that we can use the same MAE machinery as local LHS rules (and so that
+ * the lhs_rules entries have uniform semantics). It may seem odd to do it
+ * this way round, given that the corresponding fields in the MAE MCDIs are
+ * all ENC_, but (a) we don't have enc_L2 or enc_ip_proto in struct
+ * efx_tc_match_fields and (b) semantically an LHS rule doesn't have inner
+ * fields so it's just matching on *the* header rather than the outer header.
+ * Make sure that the non-enc_ keys were not already being matched on, as that
+ * would imply a rule that needed a triple lookup. (Hardware can do that,
+ * with OR-AR-CT-AR, but it halves packet rate so we avoid it where possible;
+ * see efx_tc_flower_flhs_needs_ar().)
+ */
+static int efx_tc_flower_translate_flhs_match(struct efx_tc_match *match)
+{
+ int rc = 0;
+
+#define COPY_MASK_AND_VALUE(_key, _ekey) ({ \
+ if (match->mask._key) { \
+ rc = -EOPNOTSUPP; \
+ } else { \
+ match->mask._key = match->mask._ekey; \
+ match->mask._ekey = 0; \
+ match->value._key = match->value._ekey; \
+ match->value._ekey = 0; \
+ } \
+ rc; \
+})
+#define COPY_FROM_ENC(_key) COPY_MASK_AND_VALUE(_key, enc_##_key)
+ if (match->mask.ip_proto)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ match->mask.ip_proto = ~0;
+ match->value.ip_proto = IPPROTO_UDP;
+ if (COPY_FROM_ENC(src_ip) || COPY_FROM_ENC(dst_ip))
+ return rc;
+#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6
+ if (!ipv6_addr_any(&match->mask.src_ip6))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ match->mask.src_ip6 = match->mask.enc_src_ip6;
+ memset(&match->mask.enc_src_ip6, 0, sizeof(struct in6_addr));
+ if (!ipv6_addr_any(&match->mask.dst_ip6))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ match->mask.dst_ip6 = match->mask.enc_dst_ip6;
+ memset(&match->mask.enc_dst_ip6, 0, sizeof(struct in6_addr));
+#endif
+ if (COPY_FROM_ENC(ip_tos) || COPY_FROM_ENC(ip_ttl))
+ return rc;
+ /* should really copy enc_ip_frag but we don't have that in
+ * parse_match yet
+ */
+ if (COPY_MASK_AND_VALUE(l4_sport, enc_sport) ||
+ COPY_MASK_AND_VALUE(l4_dport, enc_dport))
+ return rc;
+ return 0;
+#undef COPY_FROM_ENC
+#undef COPY_MASK_AND_VALUE
+}
+
+/* If a foreign LHS rule wants to match on keys that are only available after
+ * encap header identification and parsing, then it can't be done in the Outer
+ * Rule lookup, because that lookup determines the encap type used to parse
+ * beyond the outer headers. Thus, such rules must use the OR-AR-CT-AR lookup
+ * sequence, with an EM (struct efx_tc_encap_match) in the OR step.
+ * Return true iff the passed match requires this.
+ */
+static bool efx_tc_flower_flhs_needs_ar(struct efx_tc_match *match)
+{
+ /* matches on inner-header keys can't be done in OR */
+ return match->mask.eth_proto ||
+ match->mask.vlan_tci[0] || match->mask.vlan_tci[1] ||
+ match->mask.vlan_proto[0] || match->mask.vlan_proto[1] ||
+ memchr_inv(match->mask.eth_saddr, 0, ETH_ALEN) ||
+ memchr_inv(match->mask.eth_daddr, 0, ETH_ALEN) ||
+ match->mask.ip_proto ||
+ match->mask.ip_tos || match->mask.ip_ttl ||
+ match->mask.src_ip || match->mask.dst_ip ||
+#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6
+ !ipv6_addr_any(&match->mask.src_ip6) ||
+ !ipv6_addr_any(&match->mask.dst_ip6) ||
+#endif
+ match->mask.ip_frag || match->mask.ip_firstfrag ||
+ match->mask.l4_sport || match->mask.l4_dport ||
+ match->mask.tcp_flags ||
+ /* nor can VNI */
+ match->mask.enc_keyid;
+}
+
static int efx_tc_flower_handle_lhs_actions(struct efx_nic *efx,
struct flow_cls_offload *tc,
struct flow_rule *fr,
@@ -882,9 +978,12 @@ static int efx_tc_flower_handle_lhs_actions(struct efx_nic *efx,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack = tc->common.extack;
struct efx_tc_lhs_action *act = &rule->lhs_act;
const struct flow_action_entry *fa;
+ enum efx_tc_counter_type ctype;
bool pipe = true;
int i;
+ ctype = rule->is_ar ? EFX_TC_COUNTER_TYPE_AR : EFX_TC_COUNTER_TYPE_OR;
+
flow_action_for_each(i, fa, &fr->action) {
struct efx_tc_ct_zone *ct_zone;
struct efx_tc_recirc_id *rid;
@@ -917,7 +1016,7 @@ static int efx_tc_flower_handle_lhs_actions(struct efx_nic *efx,
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
cnt = efx_tc_flower_get_counter_index(efx, tc->cookie,
- EFX_TC_COUNTER_TYPE_OR);
+ ctype);
if (IS_ERR(cnt)) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed to obtain a counter");
return PTR_ERR(cnt);
@@ -1354,6 +1453,222 @@ static int efx_tc_incomplete_mangle(struct efx_tc_mangler_state *mung,
return 0;
}
+static int efx_tc_flower_replace_foreign_lhs_ar(struct efx_nic *efx,
+ struct flow_cls_offload *tc,
+ struct flow_rule *fr,
+ struct efx_tc_match *match,
+ struct net_device *net_dev)
+{
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack = tc->common.extack;
+ struct efx_tc_lhs_rule *rule, *old;
+ enum efx_encap_type type;
+ int rc;
+
+ type = efx_tc_indr_netdev_type(net_dev);
+ if (type == EFX_ENCAP_TYPE_NONE) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Egress encap match on unsupported tunnel device");
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+
+ rc = efx_mae_check_encap_type_supported(efx, type);
+ if (rc) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
+ "Firmware reports no support for %s encap match",
+ efx_tc_encap_type_name(type));
+ return rc;
+ }
+ /* This is an Action Rule, so it needs a separate Encap Match in the
+ * Outer Rule table. Insert that now.
+ */
+ rc = efx_tc_flower_record_encap_match(efx, match, type,
+ EFX_TC_EM_DIRECT, 0, 0, extack);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ match->mask.recirc_id = 0xff;
+ if (match->mask.ct_state_trk && match->value.ct_state_trk) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "LHS rule can never match +trk");
+ rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ goto release_encap_match;
+ }
+ /* LHS rules are always -trk, so we don't need to match on that */
+ match->mask.ct_state_trk = 0;
+ match->value.ct_state_trk = 0;
+ /* We must inhibit match on TCP SYN/FIN/RST, so that SW can see
+ * the packet and update the conntrack table.
+ * Outer Rules will do that with CT_TCP_FLAGS_INHIBIT, but Action
+ * Rules don't have that; instead they support matching on
+ * TCP_SYN_FIN_RST (aka TCP_INTERESTING_FLAGS), so use that.
+ * This is only strictly needed if there will be a DO_CT action,
+ * which we don't know yet, but typically there will be and it's
+ * simpler not to bother checking here.
+ */
+ match->mask.tcp_syn_fin_rst = true;
+
+ rc = efx_mae_match_check_caps(efx, &match->mask, extack);
+ if (rc)
+ goto release_encap_match;
+
+ rule = kzalloc(sizeof(*rule), GFP_USER);
+ if (!rule) {
+ rc = -ENOMEM;
+ goto release_encap_match;
+ }
+ rule->cookie = tc->cookie;
+ rule->is_ar = true;
+ old = rhashtable_lookup_get_insert_fast(&efx->tc->lhs_rule_ht,
+ &rule->linkage,
+ efx_tc_lhs_rule_ht_params);
+ if (old) {
+ netif_dbg(efx, drv, efx->net_dev,
+ "Already offloaded rule (cookie %lx)\n", tc->cookie);
+ rc = -EEXIST;
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Rule already offloaded");
+ goto release;
+ }
+
+ /* Parse actions */
+ rc = efx_tc_flower_handle_lhs_actions(efx, tc, fr, net_dev, rule);
+ if (rc)
+ goto release;
+
+ rule->match = *match;
+ rule->lhs_act.tun_type = type;
+
+ rc = efx_mae_insert_lhs_rule(efx, rule, EFX_TC_PRIO_TC);
+ if (rc) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed to insert rule in hw");
+ goto release;
+ }
+ netif_dbg(efx, drv, efx->net_dev,
+ "Successfully parsed lhs rule (cookie %lx)\n",
+ tc->cookie);
+ return 0;
+
+release:
+ efx_tc_flower_release_lhs_actions(efx, &rule->lhs_act);
+ if (!old)
+ rhashtable_remove_fast(&efx->tc->lhs_rule_ht, &rule->linkage,
+ efx_tc_lhs_rule_ht_params);
+ kfree(rule);
+release_encap_match:
+ if (match->encap)
+ efx_tc_flower_release_encap_match(efx, match->encap);
+ return rc;
+}
+
+static int efx_tc_flower_replace_foreign_lhs(struct efx_nic *efx,
+ struct flow_cls_offload *tc,
+ struct flow_rule *fr,
+ struct efx_tc_match *match,
+ struct net_device *net_dev)
+{
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack = tc->common.extack;
+ struct efx_tc_lhs_rule *rule, *old;
+ enum efx_encap_type type;
+ int rc;
+
+ if (tc->common.chain_index) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "LHS rule only allowed in chain 0");
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+
+ if (!efx_tc_match_is_encap(&match->mask)) {
+ /* This is not a tunnel decap rule, ignore it */
+ netif_dbg(efx, drv, efx->net_dev, "Ignoring foreign LHS filter without encap match\n");
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+
+ if (efx_tc_flower_flhs_needs_ar(match))
+ return efx_tc_flower_replace_foreign_lhs_ar(efx, tc, fr, match,
+ net_dev);
+
+ type = efx_tc_indr_netdev_type(net_dev);
+ if (type == EFX_ENCAP_TYPE_NONE) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Egress encap match on unsupported tunnel device\n");
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+
+ rc = efx_mae_check_encap_type_supported(efx, type);
+ if (rc) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
+ "Firmware reports no support for %s encap match",
+ efx_tc_encap_type_name(type));
+ return rc;
+ }
+ /* Reserve the outer tuple with a pseudo Encap Match */
+ rc = efx_tc_flower_record_encap_match(efx, match, type,
+ EFX_TC_EM_PSEUDO_OR, 0, 0,
+ extack);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ if (match->mask.ct_state_trk && match->value.ct_state_trk) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "LHS rule can never match +trk");
+ rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ goto release_encap_match;
+ }
+ /* LHS rules are always -trk, so we don't need to match on that */
+ match->mask.ct_state_trk = 0;
+ match->value.ct_state_trk = 0;
+
+ rc = efx_tc_flower_translate_flhs_match(match);
+ if (rc) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "LHS rule cannot match on inner fields");
+ goto release_encap_match;
+ }
+
+ rc = efx_mae_match_check_caps_lhs(efx, &match->mask, extack);
+ if (rc)
+ goto release_encap_match;
+
+ rule = kzalloc(sizeof(*rule), GFP_USER);
+ if (!rule) {
+ rc = -ENOMEM;
+ goto release_encap_match;
+ }
+ rule->cookie = tc->cookie;
+ old = rhashtable_lookup_get_insert_fast(&efx->tc->lhs_rule_ht,
+ &rule->linkage,
+ efx_tc_lhs_rule_ht_params);
+ if (old) {
+ netif_dbg(efx, drv, efx->net_dev,
+ "Already offloaded rule (cookie %lx)\n", tc->cookie);
+ rc = -EEXIST;
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Rule already offloaded");
+ goto release;
+ }
+
+ /* Parse actions */
+ rc = efx_tc_flower_handle_lhs_actions(efx, tc, fr, net_dev, rule);
+ if (rc)
+ goto release;
+
+ rule->match = *match;
+ rule->lhs_act.tun_type = type;
+
+ rc = efx_mae_insert_lhs_rule(efx, rule, EFX_TC_PRIO_TC);
+ if (rc) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed to insert rule in hw");
+ goto release;
+ }
+ netif_dbg(efx, drv, efx->net_dev,
+ "Successfully parsed lhs rule (cookie %lx)\n",
+ tc->cookie);
+ return 0;
+
+release:
+ efx_tc_flower_release_lhs_actions(efx, &rule->lhs_act);
+ if (!old)
+ rhashtable_remove_fast(&efx->tc->lhs_rule_ht, &rule->linkage,
+ efx_tc_lhs_rule_ht_params);
+ kfree(rule);
+release_encap_match:
+ if (match->encap)
+ efx_tc_flower_release_encap_match(efx, match->encap);
+ return rc;
+}
+
static int efx_tc_flower_replace_foreign(struct efx_nic *efx,
struct net_device *net_dev,
struct flow_cls_offload *tc)
@@ -1371,7 +1686,7 @@ static int efx_tc_flower_replace_foreign(struct efx_nic *efx,
/* Parse match */
memset(&match, 0, sizeof(match));
- rc = efx_tc_flower_parse_match(efx, fr, &match, NULL);
+ rc = efx_tc_flower_parse_match(efx, fr, &match, extack);
if (rc)
return rc;
/* The rule as given to us doesn't specify a source netdevice.
@@ -1387,6 +1702,10 @@ static int efx_tc_flower_replace_foreign(struct efx_nic *efx,
match.value.ingress_port = rc;
match.mask.ingress_port = ~0;
+ if (efx_tc_rule_is_lhs_rule(fr, &match))
+ return efx_tc_flower_replace_foreign_lhs(efx, tc, fr, &match,
+ net_dev);
+
if (tc->common.chain_index) {
struct efx_tc_recirc_id *rid;
@@ -1416,6 +1735,7 @@ static int efx_tc_flower_replace_foreign(struct efx_nic *efx,
if (match.mask.ct_state_est && !match.value.ct_state_est) {
if (match.value.tcp_syn_fin_rst) {
/* Can't offload this combination */
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "TCP flags and -est conflict for offload");
rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
goto release;
}
@@ -1442,7 +1762,7 @@ static int efx_tc_flower_replace_foreign(struct efx_nic *efx,
goto release;
}
- rc = efx_mae_match_check_caps(efx, &match.mask, NULL);
+ rc = efx_mae_match_check_caps(efx, &match.mask, extack);
if (rc)
goto release;
@@ -1470,7 +1790,7 @@ static int efx_tc_flower_replace_foreign(struct efx_nic *efx,
extack);
if (rc)
goto release;
- } else {
+ } else if (!tc->common.chain_index) {
/* This is not a tunnel decap rule, ignore it */
netif_dbg(efx, drv, efx->net_dev,
"Ignoring foreign filter without encap match\n");
@@ -1530,6 +1850,7 @@ static int efx_tc_flower_replace_foreign(struct efx_nic *efx,
goto release;
}
if (!efx_tc_flower_action_order_ok(act, EFX_TC_AO_COUNT)) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Count action violates action order (can't happen)");
rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
goto release;
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.h
index 4dd2c378fd9f5c..86e38ea7988cce 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.h
@@ -140,10 +140,14 @@ static inline bool efx_tc_match_is_encap(const struct efx_tc_match_fields *mask)
* The pseudo encap match may be referenced again by an encap match
* with different values for these fields, but all masks must match the
* first (stored in our child_* fields).
+ * @EFX_TC_EM_PSEUDO_OR: registered by an fLHS rule that fits in the OR
+ * table. The &struct efx_tc_lhs_rule already holds the HW OR entry.
+ * Only one reference to this encap match may exist.
*/
enum efx_tc_em_pseudo_type {
EFX_TC_EM_DIRECT,
EFX_TC_EM_PSEUDO_MASK,
+ EFX_TC_EM_PSEUDO_OR,
};
struct efx_tc_encap_match {
@@ -183,6 +187,7 @@ struct efx_tc_action_set_list {
};
struct efx_tc_lhs_action {
+ enum efx_encap_type tun_type;
struct efx_tc_recirc_id *rid;
struct efx_tc_ct_zone *zone;
struct efx_tc_counter_index *count;
@@ -203,6 +208,7 @@ struct efx_tc_lhs_rule {
struct efx_tc_lhs_action lhs_act;
struct rhash_head linkage;
u32 fw_id;
+ bool is_ar; /* Action Rule (for OR-AR-CT-AR sequence) */
};
enum efx_tc_rule_prios {