diff options
| author | Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> | 2023-03-28 21:10:48 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2023-03-29 17:26:09 -0700 |
| commit | 4ca13d1002f37c10038ff4ed3cfdc70dbe049d60 (patch) | |
| tree | 1c92420cfb04f0eab3e611ed06c929713b594425 | |
| parent | 8a9abe0293294fee279750058a509bbfab0c57a3 (diff) | |
| download | bpf-4ca13d1002f37c10038ff4ed3cfdc70dbe049d60.tar.gz | |
selftests/bpf: Rewrite two infinite loops in bound check cases
The two infinite loops in bound check cases added by commit
1a3148fc171f ("selftests/bpf: Check when bounds are not in the 32-bit range")
increased the execution time of test_verifier from about 6 seconds to
about 9 seconds. Rewrite these two infinite loops to finite loops to get
rid of this extra time cost.
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230329011048.1721937-1-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c | 24 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c index 74b1917d420827..43942ce8cf1515 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c @@ -784,22 +784,26 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 1), - BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 13), BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 0), BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, 0x7fffffffffffff10), BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_2, 0x8000000000000fff), BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, 0x8000000000000000), BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 3), /* r1 signed range is [S64_MIN, S64_MAX] */ - BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSLT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -2), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSLT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -3), + + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "BPF program is too large", - .result = REJECT, + .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, }, { @@ -856,21 +860,25 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 1), - BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 6), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 10), BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 0), BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0x7fffff10), BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0x80000fff), BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0x80000000), BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_JMP32_REG(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 3), /* r1 signed range is [S32_MIN, S32_MAX] */ - BPF_JMP32_REG(BPF_JSLT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -2), + BPF_JMP32_REG(BPF_JSLT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -3), + + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "BPF program is too large", - .result = REJECT, + .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, }, |