Merge tag 'xfs-6.6-merge-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux

Pull xfs updates from Chandan Babu:

 - Chandan Babu will be taking over as the XFS release manager. He has
   reviewed all the patches that are in this branch, though I'm signing
   the branch one last time since I'm still technically maintainer. :P

 - Create a maintainer entry profile for XFS in which we lay out the
   various roles that I have played for many years.  Aside from release
   manager, the remaining roles are as yet unfilled.

 - Start merging online repair -- we now have in-memory pageable memory
   for staging btrees, a bunch of pending fixes, and we've started the
   process of refactoring the scrub support code to support more of
   repair.  In particular, reaping of old blocks from damaged structures.

 - Scrub the realtime summary file.

 - Fix a bug where scrub's quota iteration only ever returned the root
   dquot.  Oooops.

 - Fix some typos.

[ Pull request from Chandan Babu, but signed tag and description from
  Darrick Wong, thus the first person singular above is Darrick, not
  Chandan ]

* tag 'xfs-6.6-merge-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux: (37 commits)
  fs/xfs: Fix typos in comments
  xfs: fix dqiterate thinko
  xfs: don't check reflink iflag state when checking cow fork
  xfs: simplify returns in xchk_bmap
  xfs: rewrite xchk_inode_is_allocated to work properly
  xfs: hide xfs_inode_is_allocated in scrub common code
  xfs: fix agf_fllast when repairing an empty AGFL
  xfs: allow userspace to rebuild metadata structures
  xfs: clear pagf_agflreset when repairing the AGFL
  xfs: allow the user to cancel repairs before we start writing
  xfs: don't complain about unfixed metadata when repairs were injected
  xfs: implement online scrubbing of rtsummary info
  xfs: always rescan allegedly healthy per-ag metadata after repair
  xfs: move the realtime summary file scrubber to a separate source file
  xfs: wrap ilock/iunlock operations on sc->ip
  xfs: get our own reference to inodes that we want to scrub
  xfs: track usage statistics of online fsck
  xfs: improve xfarray quicksort pivot
  xfs: create scaffolding for creating debugfs entries
  xfs: cache pages used for xfarray quicksort convergence
  ...

2 files changed, 195 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/index.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/index.rst
index eb252fc972aa95..09cade7eaefc8c 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/index.rst
@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ Documentation for filesystem implementations.
    virtiofs
    vfat
    xfs-delayed-logging-design
+   xfs-maintainer-entry-profile
    xfs-self-describing-metadata
    xfs-online-fsck-design
    zonefs
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs-maintainer-entry-profile.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs-maintainer-entry-profile.rst
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..32b6ac4ca9d61f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs-maintainer-entry-profile.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
+XFS Maintainer Entry Profile
+============================
+
+Overview
+--------
+XFS is a well known high-performance filesystem in the Linux kernel.
+The aim of this project is to provide and maintain a robust and
+performant filesystem.
+
+Patches are generally merged to the for-next branch of the appropriate
+git repository.
+After a testing period, the for-next branch is merged to the master
+branch.
+
+Kernel code are merged to the xfs-linux tree[0].
+Userspace code are merged to the xfsprogs tree[1].
+Test cases are merged to the xfstests tree[2].
+Ondisk format documentation are merged to the xfs-documentation tree[3].
+
+All patchsets involving XFS *must* be cc'd in their entirety to the mailing
+list linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org.
+
+Roles
+-----
+There are eight key roles in the XFS project.
+A person can take on multiple roles, and a role can be filled by
+multiple people.
+Anyone taking on a role is advised to check in with themselves and
+others on a regular basis about burnout.
+
+- **Outside Contributor**: Anyone who sends a patch but is not involved
+  in the XFS project on a regular basis.
+  These folks are usually people who work on other filesystems or
+  elsewhere in the kernel community.
+
+- **Developer**: Someone who is familiar with the XFS codebase enough to
+  write new code, documentation, and tests.
+
+  Developers can often be found in the IRC channel mentioned by the ``C:``
+  entry in the kernel MAINTAINERS file.
+
+- **Senior Developer**: A developer who is very familiar with at least
+  some part of the XFS codebase and/or other subsystems in the kernel.
+  These people collectively decide the long term goals of the project
+  and nudge the community in that direction.
+  They should help prioritize development and review work for each release
+  cycle.
+
+  Senior developers tend to be more active participants in the IRC channel.
+
+- **Reviewer**: Someone (most likely also a developer) who reads code
+  submissions to decide:
+
+  0. Is the idea behind the contribution sound?
+  1. Does the idea fit the goals of the project?
+  2. Is the contribution designed correctly?
+  3. Is the contribution polished?
+  4. Can the contribution be tested effectively?
+
+  Reviewers should identify themselves with an ``R:`` entry in the kernel
+  and fstests MAINTAINERS files.
+
+- **Testing Lead**: This person is responsible for setting the test
+  coverage goals of the project, negotiating with developers to decide
+  on new tests for new features, and making sure that developers and
+  release managers execute on the testing.
+
+  The testing lead should identify themselves with an ``M:`` entry in
+  the XFS section of the fstests MAINTAINERS file.
+
+- **Bug Triager**: Someone who examines incoming bug reports in just
+  enough detail to identify the person to whom the report should be
+  forwarded.
+
+  The bug triagers should identify themselves with a ``B:`` entry in
+  the kernel MAINTAINERS file.
+
+- **Release Manager**: This person merges reviewed patchsets into an
+  integration branch, tests the result locally, pushes the branch to a
+  public git repository, and sends pull requests further upstream.
+  The release manager is not expected to work on new feature patchsets.
+  If a developer and a reviewer fail to reach a resolution on some point,
+  the release manager must have the ability to intervene to try to drive a
+  resolution.
+
+  The release manager should identify themselves with an ``M:`` entry in
+  the kernel MAINTAINERS file.
+
+- **Community Manager**: This person calls and moderates meetings of as many
+  XFS participants as they can get when mailing list discussions prove
+  insufficient for collective decisionmaking.
+  They may also serve as liaison between managers of the organizations
+  sponsoring work on any part of XFS.
+
+- **LTS Maintainer**: Someone who backports and tests bug fixes from
+  uptream to the LTS kernels.
+  There tend to be six separate LTS trees at any given time.
+
+  The maintainer for a given LTS release should identify themselves with an
+  ``M:`` entry in the MAINTAINERS file for that LTS tree.
+  Unmaintained LTS kernels should be marked with status ``S: Orphan`` in that
+  same file.
+
+Submission Checklist Addendum
+-----------------------------
+Please follow these additional rules when submitting to XFS:
+
+- Patches affecting only the filesystem itself should be based against
+  the latest -rc or the for-next branch.
+  These patches will be merged back to the for-next branch.
+
+- Authors of patches touching other subsystems need to coordinate with
+  the maintainers of XFS and the relevant subsystems to decide how to
+  proceed with a merge.
+
+- Any patchset changing XFS should be cc'd in its entirety to linux-xfs.
+  Do not send partial patchsets; that makes analysis of the broader
+  context of the changes unnecessarily difficult.
+
+- Anyone making kernel changes that have corresponding changes to the
+  userspace utilities should send the userspace changes as separate
+  patchsets immediately after the kernel patchsets.
+
+- Authors of bug fix patches are expected to use fstests[2] to perform
+  an A/B test of the patch to determine that there are no regressions.
+  When possible, a new regression test case should be written for
+  fstests.
+
+- Authors of new feature patchsets must ensure that fstests will have
+  appropriate functional and input corner-case test cases for the new
+  feature.
+
+- When implementing a new feature, it is strongly suggested that the
+  developers write a design document to answer the following questions:
+
+  * **What** problem is this trying to solve?
+
+  * **Who** will benefit from this solution, and **where** will they
+    access it?
+
+  * **How** will this new feature work?  This should touch on major data
+    structures and algorithms supporting the solution at a higher level
+    than code comments.
+
+  * **What** userspace interfaces are necessary to build off of the new
+    features?
+
+  * **How** will this work be tested to ensure that it solves the
+    problems laid out in the design document without causing new
+    problems?
+
+  The design document should be committed in the kernel documentation
+  directory.
+  It may be omitted if the feature is already well known to the
+  community.
+
+- Patchsets for the new tests should be submitted as separate patchsets
+  immediately after the kernel and userspace code patchsets.
+
+- Changes to the on-disk format of XFS must be described in the ondisk
+  format document[3] and submitted as a patchset after the fstests
+  patchsets.
+
+- Patchsets implementing bug fixes and further code cleanups should put
+  the bug fixes at the beginning of the series to ease backporting.
+
+Key Release Cycle Dates
+-----------------------
+Bug fixes may be sent at any time, though the release manager may decide to
+defer a patch when the next merge window is close.
+
+Code submissions targeting the next merge window should be sent between
+-rc1 and -rc6.
+This gives the community time to review the changes, to suggest other changes,
+and for the author to retest those changes.
+
+Code submissions also requiring changes to fs/iomap and targeting the
+next merge window should be sent between -rc1 and -rc4.
+This allows the broader kernel community adequate time to test the
+infrastructure changes.
+
+Review Cadence
+--------------
+In general, please wait at least one week before pinging for feedback.
+To find reviewers, either consult the MAINTAINERS file, or ask
+developers that have Reviewed-by tags for XFS changes to take a look and
+offer their opinion.
+
+References
+----------
+| [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux.git/
+| [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfsprogs-dev.git/
+| [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git/
+| [3] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-documentation.git/