aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>2022-11-22 19:48:31 +0000
committerAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>2022-11-30 14:49:41 -0800
commit95bc35f9bee5220dad4e8567654ab3288a181639 (patch)
tree7fc2cb9389cc4ac5815d4d20ed1807640d84d002
parenta435874bf626f55d7147026b059008c8de89fbb8 (diff)
downloadv9fs-95bc35f9bee5220dad4e8567654ab3288a181639.tar.gz
mm/damon/sysfs: fix wrong empty schemes assumption under online tuning in damon_sysfs_set_schemes()
Commit da87878010e5 ("mm/damon/sysfs: support online inputs update") made 'damon_sysfs_set_schemes()' to be called for running DAMON context, which could have schemes. In the case, DAMON sysfs interface is supposed to update, remove, or add schemes to reflect the sysfs files. However, the code is assuming the DAMON context wouldn't have schemes at all, and therefore creates and adds new schemes. As a result, the code doesn't work as intended for online schemes tuning and could have more than expected memory footprint. The schemes are all in the DAMON context, so it doesn't leak the memory, though. Remove the wrong asssumption (the DAMON context wouldn't have schemes) in 'damon_sysfs_set_schemes()' to fix the bug. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221122194831.3472-1-sj@kernel.org Fixes: da87878010e5 ("mm/damon/sysfs: support online inputs update") Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [5.19+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-rw-r--r--mm/damon/sysfs.c46
1 files changed, 44 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/mm/damon/sysfs.c b/mm/damon/sysfs.c
index 5ce403378c2000..07e5f1bdf025fa 100644
--- a/mm/damon/sysfs.c
+++ b/mm/damon/sysfs.c
@@ -2283,12 +2283,54 @@ static struct damos *damon_sysfs_mk_scheme(
&wmarks);
}
+static void damon_sysfs_update_scheme(struct damos *scheme,
+ struct damon_sysfs_scheme *sysfs_scheme)
+{
+ struct damon_sysfs_access_pattern *access_pattern =
+ sysfs_scheme->access_pattern;
+ struct damon_sysfs_quotas *sysfs_quotas = sysfs_scheme->quotas;
+ struct damon_sysfs_weights *sysfs_weights = sysfs_quotas->weights;
+ struct damon_sysfs_watermarks *sysfs_wmarks = sysfs_scheme->watermarks;
+
+ scheme->pattern.min_sz_region = access_pattern->sz->min;
+ scheme->pattern.max_sz_region = access_pattern->sz->max;
+ scheme->pattern.min_nr_accesses = access_pattern->nr_accesses->min;
+ scheme->pattern.max_nr_accesses = access_pattern->nr_accesses->max;
+ scheme->pattern.min_age_region = access_pattern->age->min;
+ scheme->pattern.max_age_region = access_pattern->age->max;
+
+ scheme->action = sysfs_scheme->action;
+
+ scheme->quota.ms = sysfs_quotas->ms;
+ scheme->quota.sz = sysfs_quotas->sz;
+ scheme->quota.reset_interval = sysfs_quotas->reset_interval_ms;
+ scheme->quota.weight_sz = sysfs_weights->sz;
+ scheme->quota.weight_nr_accesses = sysfs_weights->nr_accesses;
+ scheme->quota.weight_age = sysfs_weights->age;
+
+ scheme->wmarks.metric = sysfs_wmarks->metric;
+ scheme->wmarks.interval = sysfs_wmarks->interval_us;
+ scheme->wmarks.high = sysfs_wmarks->high;
+ scheme->wmarks.mid = sysfs_wmarks->mid;
+ scheme->wmarks.low = sysfs_wmarks->low;
+}
+
static int damon_sysfs_set_schemes(struct damon_ctx *ctx,
struct damon_sysfs_schemes *sysfs_schemes)
{
- int i;
+ struct damos *scheme, *next;
+ int i = 0;
+
+ damon_for_each_scheme_safe(scheme, next, ctx) {
+ if (i < sysfs_schemes->nr)
+ damon_sysfs_update_scheme(scheme,
+ sysfs_schemes->schemes_arr[i]);
+ else
+ damon_destroy_scheme(scheme);
+ i++;
+ }
- for (i = 0; i < sysfs_schemes->nr; i++) {
+ for (; i < sysfs_schemes->nr; i++) {
struct damos *scheme, *next;
scheme = damon_sysfs_mk_scheme(sysfs_schemes->schemes_arr[i]);