Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf

Alexei Starovoitov says:

====================
pull-request: bpf 2021-03-04

The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net* tree.

We've added 7 non-merge commits during the last 4 day(s) which contain
a total of 9 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-).

The main changes are:

1) Fix 32-bit cmpxchg, from Brendan.

2) Fix atomic+fetch logic, from Ilya.

3) Fix usage of bpf_csum_diff in selftests, from Yauheni.
====================

9 files changed, 128 insertions, 40 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index f06fbee8638e84..5b67ea89d5f26d 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -3959,8 +3959,6 @@ int dev_change_xdp_fd(struct net_device *dev, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
 int bpf_xdp_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *prog);
 u32 dev_xdp_prog_id(struct net_device *dev, enum bpf_xdp_mode mode);
 
-int xdp_umem_query(struct net_device *dev, u16 queue_id);
-
 int __dev_forward_skb(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb);
 int dev_forward_skb(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb);
 int dev_forward_skb_nomtu(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index aa1e64196d8d2f..3a283bf97f2f67 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -2344,6 +2344,10 @@ bool __weak bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data(void *func)
 /* Return TRUE if the JIT backend wants verifier to enable sub-register usage
  * analysis code and wants explicit zero extension inserted by verifier.
  * Otherwise, return FALSE.
+ *
+ * The verifier inserts an explicit zero extension after BPF_CMPXCHGs even if
+ * you don't override this. JITs that don't want these extra insns can detect
+ * them using insn_is_zext.
  */
 bool __weak bpf_jit_needs_zext(void)
 {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 3d34ba492d461f..c56e3fcb5f1a07 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -504,6 +504,13 @@ static bool is_ptr_cast_function(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
 		func_id == BPF_FUNC_skc_to_tcp_request_sock;
 }
 
+static bool is_cmpxchg_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn)
+{
+	return BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_STX &&
+	       BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC &&
+	       insn->imm == BPF_CMPXCHG;
+}
+
 /* string representation of 'enum bpf_reg_type' */
 static const char * const reg_type_str[] = {
 	[NOT_INIT]		= "?",
@@ -1703,7 +1710,11 @@ static bool is_reg64(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 	}
 
 	if (class == BPF_STX) {
-		if (reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE)
+		/* BPF_STX (including atomic variants) has multiple source
+		 * operands, one of which is a ptr. Check whether the caller is
+		 * asking about it.
+		 */
+		if (t == SRC_OP && reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE)
 			return true;
 		return BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_DW;
 	}
@@ -1735,22 +1746,38 @@ static bool is_reg64(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 	return true;
 }
 
-/* Return TRUE if INSN doesn't have explicit value define. */
-static bool insn_no_def(struct bpf_insn *insn)
+/* Return the regno defined by the insn, or -1. */
+static int insn_def_regno(const struct bpf_insn *insn)
 {
-	u8 class = BPF_CLASS(insn->code);
-
-	return (class == BPF_JMP || class == BPF_JMP32 ||
-		class == BPF_STX || class == BPF_ST);
+	switch (BPF_CLASS(insn->code)) {
+	case BPF_JMP:
+	case BPF_JMP32:
+	case BPF_ST:
+		return -1;
+	case BPF_STX:
+		if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC &&
+		    (insn->imm & BPF_FETCH)) {
+			if (insn->imm == BPF_CMPXCHG)
+				return BPF_REG_0;
+			else
+				return insn->src_reg;
+		} else {
+			return -1;
+		}
+	default:
+		return insn->dst_reg;
+	}
 }
 
 /* Return TRUE if INSN has defined any 32-bit value explicitly. */
 static bool insn_has_def32(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
 {
-	if (insn_no_def(insn))
+	int dst_reg = insn_def_regno(insn);
+
+	if (dst_reg == -1)
 		return false;
 
-	return !is_reg64(env, insn, insn->dst_reg, NULL, DST_OP);
+	return !is_reg64(env, insn, dst_reg, NULL, DST_OP);
 }
 
 static void mark_insn_zext(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
@@ -11006,9 +11033,10 @@ static int opt_subreg_zext_lo32_rnd_hi32(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
 		int adj_idx = i + delta;
 		struct bpf_insn insn;
-		u8 load_reg;
+		int load_reg;
 
 		insn = insns[adj_idx];
+		load_reg = insn_def_regno(&insn);
 		if (!aux[adj_idx].zext_dst) {
 			u8 code, class;
 			u32 imm_rnd;
@@ -11018,14 +11046,14 @@ static int opt_subreg_zext_lo32_rnd_hi32(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 
 			code = insn.code;
 			class = BPF_CLASS(code);
-			if (insn_no_def(&insn))
+			if (load_reg == -1)
 				continue;
 
 			/* NOTE: arg "reg" (the fourth one) is only used for
-			 *       BPF_STX which has been ruled out in above
-			 *       check, it is safe to pass NULL here.
+			 *       BPF_STX + SRC_OP, so it is safe to pass NULL
+			 *       here.
 			 */
-			if (is_reg64(env, &insn, insn.dst_reg, NULL, DST_OP)) {
+			if (is_reg64(env, &insn, load_reg, NULL, DST_OP)) {
 				if (class == BPF_LD &&
 				    BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_IMM)
 					i++;
@@ -11040,31 +11068,28 @@ static int opt_subreg_zext_lo32_rnd_hi32(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 			imm_rnd = get_random_int();
 			rnd_hi32_patch[0] = insn;
 			rnd_hi32_patch[1].imm = imm_rnd;
-			rnd_hi32_patch[3].dst_reg = insn.dst_reg;
+			rnd_hi32_patch[3].dst_reg = load_reg;
 			patch = rnd_hi32_patch;
 			patch_len = 4;
 			goto apply_patch_buffer;
 		}
 
-		if (!bpf_jit_needs_zext())
+		/* Add in an zero-extend instruction if a) the JIT has requested
+		 * it or b) it's a CMPXCHG.
+		 *
+		 * The latter is because: BPF_CMPXCHG always loads a value into
+		 * R0, therefore always zero-extends. However some archs'
+		 * equivalent instruction only does this load when the
+		 * comparison is successful. This detail of CMPXCHG is
+		 * orthogonal to the general zero-extension behaviour of the
+		 * CPU, so it's treated independently of bpf_jit_needs_zext.
+		 */
+		if (!bpf_jit_needs_zext() && !is_cmpxchg_insn(&insn))
 			continue;
 
-		/* zext_dst means that we want to zero-extend whatever register
-		 * the insn defines, which is dst_reg most of the time, with
-		 * the notable exception of BPF_STX + BPF_ATOMIC + BPF_FETCH.
-		 */
-		if (BPF_CLASS(insn.code) == BPF_STX &&
-		    BPF_MODE(insn.code) == BPF_ATOMIC) {
-			/* BPF_STX + BPF_ATOMIC insns without BPF_FETCH do not
-			 * define any registers, therefore zext_dst cannot be
-			 * set.
-			 */
-			if (WARN_ON(!(insn.imm & BPF_FETCH)))
-				return -EINVAL;
-			load_reg = insn.imm == BPF_CMPXCHG ? BPF_REG_0
-							   : insn.src_reg;
-		} else {
-			load_reg = insn.dst_reg;
+		if (WARN_ON(load_reg == -1)) {
+			verbose(env, "verifier bug. zext_dst is set, but no reg is defined\n");
+			return -EFAULT;
 		}
 
 		zext_patch[0] = insn;
diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c b/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c
index db0cb73513a58b..1e2a1105d0e67a 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c
@@ -1699,5 +1699,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 
 	xdpsock_cleanup();
 
+	munmap(bufs, NUM_FRAMES * opt_xsk_frame_size);
+
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c b/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
index ffbb588724d8fc..526fc35c0b2331 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
@@ -610,15 +610,16 @@ static int xsk_lookup_bpf_maps(struct xsk_socket *xsk)
 		if (fd < 0)
 			continue;
 
+		memset(&map_info, 0, map_len);
 		err = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fd, &map_info, &map_len);
 		if (err) {
 			close(fd);
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		if (!strcmp(map_info.name, "xsks_map")) {
+		if (!strncmp(map_info.name, "xsks_map", sizeof(map_info.name))) {
 			ctx->xsks_map_fd = fd;
-			continue;
+			break;
 		}
 
 		close(fd);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/netif_receive_skb.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/netif_receive_skb.c
index 6b670039ea6799..1d8918dfbd3ff5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/netif_receive_skb.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/netif_receive_skb.c
@@ -16,6 +16,13 @@ bool skip = false;
 #define STRSIZE			2048
 #define EXPECTED_STRSIZE	256
 
+#if defined(bpf_target_s390)
+/* NULL points to a readable struct lowcore on s390, so take the last page */
+#define BADPTR			((void *)0xFFFFFFFFFFFFF000ULL)
+#else
+#define BADPTR			0
+#endif
+
 #ifndef ARRAY_SIZE
 #define ARRAY_SIZE(x)	(sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0]))
 #endif
@@ -113,11 +120,11 @@ int BPF_PROG(trace_netif_receive_skb, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	}
 
 	/* Check invalid ptr value */
-	p.ptr = 0;
+	p.ptr = BADPTR;
 	__ret = bpf_snprintf_btf(str, STRSIZE, &p, sizeof(p), 0);
 	if (__ret >= 0) {
-		bpf_printk("printing NULL should generate error, got (%d)",
-			   __ret);
+		bpf_printk("printing %llx should generate error, got (%d)",
+			   (unsigned long long)BADPTR, __ret);
 		ret = -ERANGE;
 	}
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/array_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/array_access.c
index bed53b561e0443..1b138cd2b187d9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/array_access.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/array_access.c
@@ -250,12 +250,13 @@
 	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_5, 0),
 	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
 		     BPF_FUNC_csum_diff),
+	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 0xffff),
 	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 	},
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
 	.fixup_map_array_ro = { 3 },
 	.result = ACCEPT,
-	.retval = -29,
+	.retval = 65507,
 },
 {
 	"invalid write map access into a read-only array 1",
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c
index 2efd8bcf57a1e4..6e52dfc644153f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c
@@ -94,3 +94,28 @@
 	.result = REJECT,
 	.errstr = "invalid read from stack",
 },
+{
+	"BPF_W cmpxchg should zero top 32 bits",
+	.insns = {
+		/* r0 = U64_MAX; */
+		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+		BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+		/* u64 val = r0; */
+		BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -8),
+		/* r0 = (u32)atomic_cmpxchg((u32 *)&val, r0, 1); */
+		BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 1),
+		BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_W, BPF_CMPXCHG, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_1, -8),
+		/* r1 = 0x00000000FFFFFFFFull; */
+		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 1),
+		BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_1, 32),
+		BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, 1),
+		/* if (r0 != r1) exit(1); */
+		BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 2),
+		BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		/* exit(0); */
+		BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.result = ACCEPT,
+},
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_or.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_or.c
index 70f982e1f9f05f..9d0716ac508080 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_or.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_or.c
@@ -75,3 +75,28 @@
 	},
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 },
+{
+	"BPF_W atomic_fetch_or should zero top 32 bits",
+	.insns = {
+		/* r1 = U64_MAX; */
+		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+		BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, 1),
+		/* u64 val = r1; */
+		BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_1, -8),
+		/* r1 = (u32)atomic_fetch_or((u32 *)&val, 2); */
+		BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 2),
+		BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_W, BPF_OR | BPF_FETCH, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_1, -8),
+		/* r2 = 0x00000000FFFFFFFF; */
+		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1),
+		BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_2, 32),
+		BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_2, 1),
+		/* if (r2 != r1) exit(1); */
+		BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 2),
+		BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		/* exit(0); */
+		BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.result = ACCEPT,
+},